A post from Shady Characters

Emoji, part 6b: steps in the right direction

This is the seventh in a series of thirteen posts on Emoji (šŸ˜‚). Start at PART 1, continue to PART 8 or view ALL POSTS in the series.


The emoji enlightenment dawned in August 2015. As we saw last time, that was the month in which the Unicode Consortium published ā€œEmoji 1.0ā€, a document that listed all available emoji characters and, crucially, described how to create new emoji by combining existing symbols.1 It was a big change to the status quo, and it was done with one overriding aim in mind: to allow emoji to become more representative of the people who used it. So what did Unicode do with that newfound freedom? Weā€™ll find out over the next two parts as we follow emojiā€™s journey from Emoji 1.0 right up to the present day.


1.
Burge, Jeremy. ā€œEmoji Version 1.0ā€. Emojipedia. Accessed February 7, 2019.

Ā ā†¢

2 comments on “Emoji, part 6b: steps in the right direction

  1. Comment posted by dtw42 on

    Regarding default skin tones (and the difficulties in picking one that won’t prompt outcries) ā€“ blues and greens surely were never going to take off ā€“ they’d make everybody look ill or like aliens. Isn’t grey (dull-looking though it is) the best solution? If someone’s rendered in mono, you can’t tell what colour they are…

Leave a comment

Required fields are marked *. Your email address will not be published. If you prefer to contact me privately, please see the Contact page.

Leave a blank line for a new paragraph. You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>. Learn how your comĀ­ment data is proĀ­cessed.